{"id":10862,"date":"2024-03-26T16:04:48","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T16:04:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sup-yumigahama.com\/uncategorized\/kate-middleton-conspiracy-theories-explained-why-the-internet-was-convinced-car-photo-was-fake\/"},"modified":"2024-03-26T16:04:51","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T16:04:51","slug":"kate-middleton-conspiracy-theories-explained-why-the-internet-was-convinced-car-photo-was-fake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sup-yumigahama.com\/royals\/kate-middleton-conspiracy-theories-explained-why-the-internet-was-convinced-car-photo-was-fake\/","title":{"rendered":"Kate Middleton Conspiracy Theories Explained: Why the Internet Was Convinced Car Photo Was Fake"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\"Kate<\/div>
Chris Jackson\/Getty Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Princess Kate Middleton<\/strong><\/a> was photographed with husband Prince William<\/strong> while in the car \u2014 but conspiracy theorists were quick to run wild with accusations of editing, decoys and more.<\/p>\n

The Princess of Wales, 42, was seen in a car with William, 41, on Monday, March 11, in photos obtained by the Daily Mail<\/em><\/a>, marking only the second time Kate has been seen in public since her January abdominal surgery. The royals were photographed driving from Windsor Castle to a private appointment, and Kate\u2019s head was turned away.<\/p>\n

Since the photo was published, conspiracy theories have surfaced that the photo is not real, and the rumors were so rampant that both the photographer, Jim Bennett<\/strong>, and photo syndication service, Goff Photos, have had to deny the rumors<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The agency told E! News<\/em><\/a> earlier this week that the photos \u201chave been cropped and lightened\u201d but \u201cnothing has been doctored.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bennett echoed the idea in his own statement. \u201cWe don\u2019t change our photos in Photoshop other than adjusting the light levels if necessary,\u201d the photographer told The New York Post<\/em><\/a> on Tuesday, March 12.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe cars left Windsor Castle and I photographed them a short distance away on Datchet High Street \u2014 outside No. 39, to be precise!\u201d he added. \u201cCar shots are unpredictable at the best of times and with some reflection on the glass, it can be difficult.\u201d<\/p>\n

Conspiracy theorists noticed that the bricks seen through the car windows are multicolored while the ones seen above the car are all the same muted red tone, indicating an older wall. However, a simple Google Maps search of 39 High St. in Datchet, England, shows that the newer brick seen through the window would\u2019ve been the garden wall while the older brick seen above the car was the exterior of a historic building called Datchet Lodge.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\"Prince<\/div>

\n Catherine, Princess of Wales, and Prince William, attend The Royal Variety Performance in November 2023.<\/span> Ricky Vigil M\/Justin E Palmer\/GC Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Despite debunking the brick evidence, some still don\u2019t believe it\u2019s a real photo. Many social media sleuths even speculated that the photo of Kate looking away matches ones taken on Christmas Day.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat is not Kate in the car picture \u2026 absolutely nothing like her!\u201d one X user said while another added, \u201cWhere is Kate? Fake family pictures and a sketchy car pap photo?! Something isn\u2019t right \u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

There are others who think that the photo is real \u2014 but claim that Kate isn\u2019t in the photo.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt honestly looks like Pippa to me,\u201d one royal watcher wrote via X. \u201cThat being said, I\u2019ve been around for longer than a minute. I don\u2019t remember anything this weird coming from the RF, ever.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pippa Middleton<\/strong>, the princess\u2019 sister made famous<\/a> as a bridesmaid at the royal wedding in 2011, is the less scandalous guess with some suggesting that it\u2019s actually Rose Hanbury<\/strong> in the Commonwealth Day photo.<\/p>\n